Moderated by: Stealth, MOTman, KevG, bimmer | Page: 1 2 ![]() ![]() |
|
Very Dim ABS light will it pass | Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 10:04 pm |
|
1st Post |
Wesley Trade Member
![]() |
General Off-Topic "Discussions" for the continuation of discussions when a topic has been closed. but also includes other stuff ![]()
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 09:54 pm |
|
2nd Post |
Spunkymonkey Member ![]()
![]() |
They probably included 1(d) so that people (including stroppy punters) couldn't "interpret" things in an unintended way. Consider a system where the light is supposed to illuminate for 2 seconds, then go out briefly, then stay off if the system is ok, or relight and stay on if a fault's detected. Now, if the light comes on and stays on (without going out in between) then it's not following a correct sequence - it's doing something that neither a healthy or faulty system should cause it to. You can't say it's "indicating an ABS fault" because what it's indicating is meaningless - it's not giving a correct indication that the ABS is good or bad. So the RFR would be 1(c) - "does not follow the correct sequence". If, however, it comes on, then goes out, then comes on again it is following a correct sequence - the sequence that indicates a fault. The sequence is correct so RFR 1(c) can't apply. But it's still a fail because it's (correctly) indicating an ABS fault.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 09:51 pm |
|
3rd Post |
Wesley Trade Member
![]() |
Auto Engineer wrote: Wesley wrote:Auto Engineer wrote:Stealth wrote:Auto Engineer wrote: Thank You for your reply, There is a "General Off Topic" Heading, where We can have further discussions on items after any post has concluded. Would it not have been better and more proffesional to use this option rather than introduce the "scenario" into an innocent enquiry by "judith"? The only confusion I could see was yours, Its still "pass and advise" ![]() some food for thought? Wes.
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 09:39 pm |
|
4th Post |
RFR Member
![]() |
This is all starting to look "Very Dim" ![]() But hay, what is the meaning of Dim and Very????????????????????????????? rfr ![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 07:20 pm |
|
5th Post |
Wesley Trade Member
![]() |
Auto Engineer wrote: Stealth wrote:Auto Engineer wrote: RFR 1d, Indicates a fault, With the Lamp staying On. How does this relate to "judiths" vehicle ![]() Wes.
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 07:19 pm |
|
6th Post |
Stealth Super Moderator ![]()
![]() |
Auto Engineer wrote: Somebody has to think outside the box, otherwise everyone would just be cattle, then when one falls off the edge, the rest on autopilot just follow Therein lies the issue Auto Engineer... Members of the public come on this forum to seek advice about MOT matters. In most cases a simple pass, fail, advise, reply will answer the question, It's when forum members start to 'think outside the box,' that confusion arises ![]() Ultimately, I'm sure some members of the public have gone away feeling that.. a. They havent got a clear answer to their question. b. They still dont know if their car should pass/fail. c. It doesn't instill the general public with confidence in the MOT scheme, and the competence of testers in general, when there is dissent and disagreement on pass/fail criteria amongst the supposedly qualified and experienced members of this forum. As I've implied in prevous posts, it's this 'thinking outside the box' that's lead to testers making the wrong decision - in a number of cases this has lead to disciplinary action from VOSA directly as a result of NOT reading the manual thoroughly & making the wrong pass/fail decisions. There's absolutely nothing wrong with a healthy, logical debate about areas of disagreement - but lets not make ourselves, as members, and indeed the forum as a whole, look silly in the eyes of the general public !!! Regards Stealth ![]() Last edited on Wed Apr 15th, 2009 07:26 pm by Stealth |
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 06:01 pm |
|
7th Post |
Stealth Super Moderator ![]()
![]() |
Auto Engineer wrote:
There you go - 'Interpreting' again.......... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited on Wed Apr 15th, 2009 06:01 pm by Stealth |
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 05:44 pm |
|
8th Post |
Auto Engineer Guest
![]() |
VOSA Technical Services said; Message Number 03865**** Date sent 15/04/2009 Time 09;10 Thank you for your message. RfR 1d for ABS systems states that the vehicle should fail if the warning lamp indicates an ABS fault. If the lamp indicates a fault with the ABS system, then the vehicle should be failed even if the ABS system is operating normally. Regards Stephen. I think this is what should be the correct understanding of the above; If the vehicle is fitted with an antilock braking system, check that; (a) a warning lamp is fitted (b) the lamp illuminates (c) the lamp follows the correct sequence of operation (d) does not indicate a fault (Rfr 1d) Indicates a fault This reason for rejection I understand to mean that it does indicate a fault with the operation of the ABS electrical system, which is advised to the person looking at it that a fault is present within the ABS electrical system., shown by the operation of the ABS lamp staying on! The first part above is from VOSA, the final paragraph is my understanding of what I think it means. Any further improvements to the above welcome. Auto Engineer ![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15th, 2009 12:04 am |
|
9th Post |
big..E. Trade Member
![]() |
Incognental again?....lol....![]()
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 11:56 pm |
|
10th Post |
Wesley Trade Member
![]() |
True Bro, Me Thinks "Trebogus" Is Going Continental. ![]() Laters. ![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 11:36 pm |
|
11th Post |
big..E. Trade Member
![]() |
I think were better off without the "W"...Do we have an anchor???....lol.....![]()
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 10:58 pm |
|
12th Post |
Wesley Trade Member
![]() |
RFR wrote: Hi Auto Engineer, ![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 10:57 pm |
|
13th Post |
Wesley Trade Member
![]() |
Auto Engineer wrote: I think "ABS lamp indicates a fault" means that it "Thats the ABS lamp" does not follow the correct operating procedure, so it illuminates but then, "STAYS ON"! The "Original Question" was posted by some poor young lady called "judith" ![]() Her Vehicle followed "the correct procedure" ![]() The Original Question, Was Indeed answered Correctly. ![]() So You managed to twist it around again! ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 10:29 pm |
|
14th Post |
RFR Member
![]() |
Hi Auto Engineer, many thanks for reminding me of my missing "w", I can take some warmth however, from the fact that "I can" without pulling the manual apart, tell if the ABS lamp is following the correct sequence and for that I do not need to be rescued. As for becoming the coxswain, I feel this could be a bad idea, for the person in need may perish, before you have pulled the operations manual apart and then phoned tomorrow for advise ![]() rfr The coxsWain ![]() ps. Thanks for finding my "W", the crew will be grateful too you ![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 10:20 pm |
|
15th Post |
Spike Member
![]() |
If the vehicle is fitted with an anti-lock braking system, check that a. a warning lamp is fitted b. the lamp illuminates c. the lamp follows the correct sequence of operation d. does not indicate a fault. a, b & c could all PASS, but during the MOT test the lamp could illuminate to indicate a fault.
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 10:20 pm |
|
16th Post |
Wesley Trade Member
![]() |
Looking Forward to the reply from VOSA.![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 09:44 pm |
|
17th Post |
big..E. Trade Member
![]() |
Familiar Really![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 09:22 pm |
|
18th Post |
RFR Member
![]() |
Hi All, Once I have repaired the ABS lamp on the lifeboat, I can feel a lifeboat launch coming on ![]() It all sounds too familiar ![]() rfr The coxsain
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 09:17 pm |
|
19th Post |
nicknak Trade Member ![]()
![]() |
Last edited on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 09:18 pm by nicknak |
||||||||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14th, 2009 08:04 pm |
|
20th Post |
Stealth Super Moderator ![]()
![]() |
Auto Engineer wrote:
I dont need to go round the houses to justify anything - just trying to give you an example where there could be other information over & above the normal ABS light which COULD INDICATE a fault. With regards to Judith's case....... THE ABS LAMP FOLLOWS THE CORRECT SEQUENCE, BUT THE BULB IS DIM - IF HER CAR HAD A FAULT THE ABS LAMP WOULD NOT FOLLOW THE CORRECT SEQUENCE. Therefore - her car passes. Please let the forum know what VOSA advise - because I really can't be bothered to type any more on this subject. ![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
Current time is 07:39 pm | Page: 1 2 ![]() ![]() |
MOT Forum - The MOT Testing Forum for the UK MOT Testing Industry > Public Category (Ask questions about your car and the MOT) > Pass or Fail? Ask about your car and the MOT | MOT Forum > Very Dim ABS light will it pass | Top |